Última alteração: 2023-05-11
Resumo
This article presents a research that has as its theme the evaluation of sustainability in the urban context, in neighborhoods and cities. More specifically, based on the principle that it is necessary to evaluate to make a decision about which technologies should be incorporated into the built environment, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was carried out on the CAPES portal and on google scholar. As a result, a list of tools for assessing sustainability in the urban context, in neighborhoods and cities, was obtained.
Palavras-chave
Referências
Assarkhaniki, Zahra, et al. The Conceptualisation of Resilience Dimensions and Comprehensive Quantification of the Associated Indicators: A Systematic Approach. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 51, 2020, p. 101840.
CATALANO, Chiara et al. Smart sustainable cities of the new millennium: towards design for nature. Circular Economy and Sustainability, v. 1, n. 3, p. 1053-1086, 2021.
CHEN, Sylvia. A comprehensive review of Sustainable Assessment Tools in the Asia Pacific. 2013.
COHEN, Matthew. A systematic review of urban sustainability assessment literature. Sustainability, v. 9, n. 11, p. 2048, 2017.
COHEN, Boyd. The Smart City Wheel. 2013. Disponível em: <https://www.smart-circle.org/smart-city/boyd-cohen-smart-city-wheel/>. Acesso em: março de 2023.
CUNHA, R. R. Cunha, Rodrigo Rafael. "Rankings e Indicadores para Smart Cities: uma proposta de cidades inteligentes autopoieticas." Dissertação de mestrado. EGC. 2019.. Disponível em: <https://repositorio.ufsc.br/bitstream/handle/123456789/215499/PEGC0580-D.pdf?sequence=-1&isAllowed=y>
DAWODU, Ayotunde; Cheshmehzangi, A.; Sharifi, A., & Oladejo, J. l. Neighborhood sustainability assessment tools: Research trends and forecast for the built environment. Sustainable Futures, v. 4, p. 100064, 2022.
ELRAYIES, Ghada Mohammad. Prophylactic Architecture: Formulating the Concept of Pandemic-Resilient Homes. Buildings, v. 12, n. 7, p. 927, 2022.
Ghouchani, Mahya, et al. Identification and Assessment of Hidden Capacities of Urban Resilience. Environment, Development and Sustainability, vol. 23, no. 3, 2021, pp. 3966–3993.
JAMOUSSI, Bassem; ABU-RIZAIZA, Asad; AL-HAIJ, Ali. Sustainable Building Standards, Codes and Certification Systems: The Status Quo and Future Directions in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, v. 14, n. 16, p. 10314, 2022.
KAUR, Harsimran; GARG, Pushplata. Urban sustainability assessment tools: A review. Journal of cleaner production, v. 210, p. 146-158, 2019.
Kohler, Niklaus. The Relevance of BEQUEST: an Observer's Perspective. Building Research and Information : the International Journal of Research, Development and Demonstration, vol. 30, no. 2, 2002, pp. 130–138.
Li, Wei, et al. Applying an Improved Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix Method to Strategic Environmental Assessment of Urban Planning in China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 46, 2014, pp. 13–24.
Mauree, D., Naboni, E., Coccolo, S., Perera, A. T. D., Nik, V. M.; Scartezzini, J. L. A review of assessment methods for the urban environment and its energy sustainability to guarantee climate adaptation of future cities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 112, p. 733-746, 2019.
Saiu, Valeria, et al. Making Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs) Operational at Suburban Level: Potentials and Limitations of Neighbourhood Sustainability Assessment Tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 96, 2022, p. 106845.
Schetke, Sophie, Dagmar Haase, and Theo Kötter. Towards Sustainable Settlement Growth: A New Multi-criteria Assessment for Implementing Environmental Targets into Strategic Urban Planning. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 32, no. 1 (2012): 195-210.
Stauskis, Gintaras. Green Architecture Paradigm: from Urban Utopia to Modern Methods of Quality Assessment/Zaliosios Architekturos Paradigma: Nuo Urbanistiines Utopijos Iki Siuolaikiniu Tvarumo Vertinimo Metodikyu. Science Future of Lithuania, vol. 5, no. 3, 2013, p. 181.
Xue, Xiaobo, et al. Critical Insights for a Sustainability Framework to Address Integrated Community Water Services: Technical Metrics and Approaches. Water Research (Oxford), vol. 77, 2015, pp. 155–169.