Última alteração: 2023-04-23
Resumo
A diversidade cultural na prática culinária retrata a polifonia que envolve a variedade de aromas, sabores, povos e lugares. Todavia, esses aspectos culturais influenciam diretamente o consumo de alimentos e os modos de preparo, impactando significativamente o hábito da cocção sustentável. Neste cenário, o Design para o Comportamento Sustentável visa apoiar soluções orientadas a influenciar comportamentos durante a fase de uso de produtos, tendo por finalidade garantir a mudança, conduzir ou informar o usuário a uma tomada de decisão mais sustentável. Esse estudo visa apresentar uma análise crítica, exploratória e qualitativa da literatura, sobre estudos de hábitos culturais para uma cocção sustentável durante o uso de eletrodomésticos. A partir do método de Revisão Bibliográfica Sistemática, foi possível identificar lacunas e ênfases acerca dos temas abordados. Os resultados apontam para uma carência de dados durante o consumo de recursos no ambiente doméstico e a existência de soluções insipientes na área da cocção com foco em influenciar o usuário a tomadas de decisões mais sustentáveis. Enfatiza-se, desse modo, a necessidade da aplicação de estratégias de Design para o Comportamento Sustentável em soluções que viabilizem o consumo em tempo real para influenciar o usuário a tomadas de decisão mais sustentáveis.
Palavras-chave
Referências
ANDRÉ, Ana Isabel Neves Ferreira. Sazonalidade e Alimentação Influência da Sazonalidade nos Hábitos Alimentares. Universidade do Porto, 2013.
BAINES, J. & MORGAN, B. Sustainability appraisal: A social perspective. In DATAL-CLAYTON, B. & SADLER, B. (eds). Sustainability Appraisal: A Review of International Experience and Practice. First Draft of Work in Progress, London: International Institute for Environment and Development, 2004.
BANERJEE-DUBE, Ishita. Cooking Cultures: Convergent histories of food and feeling. Delhi, India: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
BELL, David & VALENTINE, Gill. Consuming geographies: we are where we eat. Great Britain: Routledge, 1997.
BHAMRA, Tracy. et al. Sustainable Use: Changing Consumer Behaviour through Product Design. Changing the Change: Design Visions. Proposals and Tools, Turin, 2008, Proceedings.
BHAMRA, Tracy, LILLEY, Debra & TANG, Tang. Design for Sustainable Behaviour: Using Products to Change Consumer Behaviour. The Design Journal. V.01, 427-445, December 2011.
BOKS, C. Design for Sustainable Behavior research challenges. In: Design for Innovative Value towards a Sustainable Society: p. 328-333, 2012.
BRASIL. Ministério da Cultura. Aromas, Cores e Sabores do Brasil. Brasília, 2013.
BYRD, Melanie & DUNN, John P. Cooking through history: a worldwide encyclopedia of food with menus and recipes. Santa Barbara, California, US: Greenwood, 2021.
CESCHIN, Fabrizio & GAZIULUSOY, Ídil. Design for Sustainability: a multi-level framework from products to socio-technical systems. New York: Routledge Focus, 2020.
CERTEAU, Michel de; GIARD, Luce; MAYOL, Pierre. The practice of everyday life. Volume 2: Living & Cooking. Minneapolis, USA: University of Minessota, 1998.
CHAVAN, A.L., GORNEY, D., PRABHU, B., ARORA, S. The Washing Machine That Ate My Sari – Mistakes in Cross-Cultural Design. Interactions, v16, January + February, 2009.
COLANTONIO, A. Social Sustainability: An Exploratory Analysis of its Definition, Assessment Methods, Metrics and Tools. EIBURS Working Paper Series, 2007/01. Oxford, UK: Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development, Oxford Brookes University, 2007.
CONFORTO, E. C. et al. Roteiro para revisão bibliográfica sistemática: aplicação no desenvolvimento de produtos e gerenciamento de projetos. In: 8° CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE GESTÃO DE DESENVOLVIMENTO DE PRODUTOS – CBGDP. Anais p. 1- 12, Porto Alegre, 2011.
DELOITTE. Rethinking emerging market strategies: From offshore to strategic expansion. Deloitte Review, Issue 4, 2009.
DIAS, Sandro. Do campo à mesa: limites e possibilidades de uma gastronomia sustentável. Tese. Piracicaba: Universidade de São Paulo, 2016.
ELIZONDO, G. M. Designing for sustainable behaviour in cross-cultural contexts: a design framework. Design School. Loughborough University, 2011.
EUROSTAT. Consumers in Europe – Facts and figures on services of general interest. EU, 2007.
FAO. Sustainable food value chain development – Guiding principles. High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition (HLPE). 2014. Food losses and waste in the context of sustainable food systems. A report by the High-Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security. Rome, 2014.
FRANKOWSKA, Angelina. et al. Impacts of home cooking methods and appliances on the GHG emissions of food. Nature Food Journal, V. 01, 787-791, December 2020.
GATLEY, Andy; CARAHER, Martin & LANG, Tim. A qualitative, cross cultural examination of attitudes and behaviour in relation to cooking habits in France and Britain. Elsevier: Appetite, v. 75, pp. 71-71. 2014.
HAGER, Tiffany. & MORAWICKI, Ruben. Energy consumption during cooking in the residential sector of developed nations: a review. Food Policy. V.40, 54-53, March 2013.
IRIBAGIZA, Chantal; SHARPE, Taylor; WILSON, Daniel; THOMAS, Evan A. User-centered design of an air quality feedback technology to promote adoption of clean cookstoves. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 30:925-936, 2020.
LAITALA, K., KLEPP, G.I. & BOKS, C. Changing laundry habits in Norway. International Journal of Consumer Studies. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2012.
LEACH, Edmund. Claude Lévi-Strauss. New York: Viking, 1970.
LEFF, E. Racionalidade Ambiental: a reapropriação social da natureza. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2006.
LÉVI-STRAUSS, Claude. Mythologiques 1: Le cru et le cuit. V.1. Paris: Plon, 1964.
LILLEY, Debra. Designing for Behavioural Change: Reducing the Social Impacts of Product Use Through Design. Doctoral Thesis. Loughborough University, 2007.
LILLEY, Debra. Design for sustainable behaviour: strategies and perceptions. Design Studies. V.30, N.6, 704-720, November 2009.
LOCKTON, D., HARRISON, D. Exploring design patterns for sustainable behavior. Design Journal: V.16, No. 4, p. 431-459, Stanton, N.A., 2013.
MACIEL, Maria Eunice. Uma cozinha à brasileira. Estudos Históricos, n. 33, pp 25-39. Rio de Janeiro, January-June, 2004.
MATSUHASHI, Noriko, KUIJER, Lenneke, & JONG de, Annelise. A Culture‐Inspired Approach to Gaining Insights for Designing Sustainable Practices. EcoDesign, Japan. 2009.
MEDEIROS, J. F. de, ROCHA, C. G. da. & RIBEIRO, J. L. D. Design for Sustainable Behavior (DfSB): Analysis of existing frameworks of behavior change strategies, experts' assessment and proposal for a decision support diagram. Journal of Cleaner Production, V.188, p.402-415, 2018.
MILLS, Susanna; WHITE, Martin; BROWN, Heather; WRIEDEN, Wendy; KWASNICKA, Dominika; HALLIGAN, Joel; ROBALINO, Shannon & ADAMS, Jean. Health and social determinants and outcomes of home cooking: A systematic review of observational studies. Elsevier: Appetite, v. 111, pp. 116-134, 2017.
PAKULA, C. & STAMMINGER, R. Electricity and water consumption for laundry washing by washing machine worldwide. Energy Efficiency. Springer Publishing, Netherlands, 2010.
PEATTIE, K. & SHAW, B. (2007). Consumption: Reducing, Reusing and Recycling. Disponível em: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/my-esrc/grants/RES-568–28–5001/ outputs/Download/c5352960–d286–492c-8bea-98a68fbc8a90. Acesso: Setembro 2021. Ano: 2007.
PILCHER, Jeffrey M. Tamales or Timbales: Cuisine and the Formation of Mexican National Identity, 1821–1911. The Americas 53 (2): 193–216, 1998.
PINK, S. Home Truths. Oxford: Berg, 2004.
PINK, S. Dirty Laundry. Everyday practice, sensory engagement and the constitution of identity. Social Anthropology, 13, 275-290, 2005.
POLESE, M. & STREN, R. The Social Sustainability of Cities: Diversity and the Management of Change. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000.
REDSTRÖM, J. Towards user design? On the shift from object to user as the subject of design. Design Studies, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp.123–139, 2006.
RICHTER, Christian Paul & STAMMINGER, Rainer. Water consumption in the kitchen – a case study in four European countries. Water Resource Manage (26), pp. 1639-1649. Springer, 2012.
RODRIGUEZ, E., & BOKS, C. How design of products affects user behaviour and vice versa: The environmental implications. In: Proceedings e Fourth International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Eco Design 2005, p. 54-61. Tokyo, Japan, 2005.
ROSENZWEIG, C. et al. Climate change responses beneft from a global food system approach. Nature Food, V.1, p. 94–97, 2020.
SHOVE, E. Converging conventions of comfort, cleanliness and convenience. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26 (4). pp. 395-418. ISSN 0168-7034, 2003.
SINNER, J., BAINES, J., CRENGLE, H., SALMON, G., FENEMOR, A. & TIPA, G. Sustainable development: A summary of key concepts. Ecologic Research, Report No. 2, 2004.
SPENCER, Jak., LILLEY, Debra & PORTER, Samantha. The implications of cultural differences in laundry behaviours for Design for Sustainable Behaviour: a case study between the UK, India and Brazil. Loughborough University, 2015.
WEVER, R., KUIJK, J. Van & BOKS, C. User-centred Design for Sustainable Behaviour. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering: V. 1, N. 1, 2008.
WILHITE, H. Social Loading and Sustainable Consumption. Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 26, 1999.
ZONG, Jianfang; TIAN, Jianwei; GAO, Donfeng & ZHANG, Xin. Guidelines for green design of cooking appliances. E3S Web of Conferences 118, 02003. ICAEER 2019. 2019.